.
But Flaica-Cub deny: it says that the boycott was aimed only to Israeli products. Measure you certainly can not share, and also deprecate (as approved). But the proposal with a lot of pride for China (on the products and Olympics) at the time of repression in Tibet. And even suggested by the Bush government officials to French products at the time of the refusal of France to the U.S. initiative to invade Iraq.
We see their website and the press Online http://www.cub.it/article/?c=flaica-cub&id=5058
In the newspapers there is no "yellow". It is assumed that they did "back off". In such a network is trying to reverse this documentation, publishing the text of a leaflet that was distributed by such review, eg. "Focus on Israel" http://www.focusonisrael.org/2009/01/08/flaica-boicottaggio-negozi-ebrei/
But come to think of this flyer does not constitute evidence. Who can prove that the leaflet was printed and distributed effectively by the union signed it, rather than being a fake? Flaica Cub insists on a denial to Republic http://www.cub.it/article/?c=&id=5057
for me so there is a mystery: it could be that the wheel and aberrant informed us it was and then was withdrawn to clear unworthiness. But it could also be that it was a stunt or a fake. I doubt remains.
Examination of probability:
.
1) likelihood of a "press withdrawn." The statement on the boycott of Jewish shops and their list contains something undeniably repulsive to consciousness of the average municipality, whatever anyone may think, that still seems unlikely that a trade union, however marginal, to decide to propose a measure so abhorrent. Can still be an accident: an official idiot and a racist who prepares a flyer and it does not distribute controlled, disgraced his union and getting the opposite effect to what he wanted. The reaction, which seems a bit 'of the weak "Flaica" (as he too Fiacchini) can give an indication of support to the argument of the error (severe).
.
2) likelihood of a "bogus statement." Note Flaica the proposal of a boycott of Israeli products, is prepared text for a boycott confuse this with the measure of the repulsive and racist boycott of Jewish shops. This allows both to highlight and rubbish left over the union in question, who has proposed a boycott of Israeli products in general, both to ease, raising the specter of racism, the general situation of hostility, which is growing, politics Israel. This hypothesis can be false: it is a fake effective action, and not easily smentibile. And although Viga always the first law of stupidity enunciated by Carlo Cipolla (Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation), the logic gives us instead of thinking che sia più probabile che venga fatta una azione efficace al suo scopo che una controproducente.
.
Resta, per me, il giallo, e la necessità, specie in momenti critici, di mantenere il sangue freddo e di fare inchiesta il più possibile, al di là delle indicazioni non sufficientemente analitiche, e tendenti a creare casi e clamore, dei principali giornali. E il dato di fatto inquietante: una notizia dubbia, data per certa mille volte sarà, nella coscienza dei più, una verità. Chissà di quante la nostra coscienza è composta. Chissà: forse la nostra coscienza è sempre più intessuta di nulla "mediatico".
Resta comunque un fatto: che questo comunicato sia stato "abortito" o che sia falso, si tratta comunque di un "comunicato fantasma". E nei media, viene indicato invece come un fatto. E diviene un pretesto gonfiato per dichiarazioni e azioni pubbliche dimostrative di esponenti delle istituzioni. Perchè, se davvero fosse un fatto, non è partita invece nessuna legittima denuncia per istigazione al razzismo?
Guido Aragona ( tratto da http://bizblog.splinder.com/post/19540951/Il+giallo+del+comunicato+Flaic )
0 comments:
Post a Comment